Excerpted and adapted from above. Some of us have very happy childhoods extended into hard-working, focused adulthoods because we continue in childlike fashion, at will, to think and play.
DFW: I had a clerk at the F.W. Woolworth I liked who used to say a good toy's job is to comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable.
I guess a big part of any good playsets’ purpose then is to give the Inner Child, who like all of us sometimes gets sort of marooned in our own skull, to give imaginative access to other selves - preferably small, plastic selves..
Since an ineluctable part of being a human self is playing, part of what we humans come to toys for is an experience of enjoying (and that includes suffering) necessarily a vicarious experience, more like a sort of "interpretation" of life in miniature - filtered of course by an individual's exposure to homelife, media, school, etc.... Does this make sense?
We all play alone in the real world; true empathy’s possible in miniature. But if a playset can allow us imaginatively to identify with a character’s pain, we might then also more easily conceive of others identifying with our own enjoyment. The HOBBY is born! This is nourishing, redemptive; we become (as at OTSN) less alone inside.
It might just be that simple. But now realize that some playsets, based as they are on TV and popular film and most kinds of "low" art—which just means art whose primary aim is to make money—sell and are to their makers lucrative precisely because toymakers recognize that Inner Children prefer 100 percent nostalgic pleasure to the more "adult" reality that tends to be 49 percent pleasure and 51 percent pain. Whereas "serious" playsets (witness Barzso's upcoming "Battle on Lexington Green"), which are not primarily about getting money out of you, are more apt to make you uncomfortable, or to force you to play and think hard to access their pleasures - the same way that in real life true pleasure is usually a by-product of hard work and discomfort. So it’s not hard for toy and playset collectors on limited budgets, especially those of us been raised to expect toys to be 100 percent pleasurable and to make that pleasure cheap, to collect and display and, yes, 'play with' and appreciate serious (read: historical; more expensive) playsets. They're THAT good. The problem isn’t that today’s serious collector is "broke"; I don’t think. Just that TV and the commercial-art mass-produced classic playset culture’s trained it to be sort of stuck in the past: lazy and childish in their expectations. The key word is "childish". Here's where collectors get crazy about, say, a stapled-shut Marx "Custer's last Stand". But it makes trying to engage today’s collectors both imaginatively and intellectually unprecedentedly hard.
'
Wallace, of course, needed toys . . .